VAARTA · Ignite The Build Topic 1 · The Business Under Our Nose

AgriCreditERP Suite

Software that runs the farm, and turns its own records into credit.

It records what a crop costs while it is still growing, and turns that into a credit file a bank can read.

Golyan Group
AgriFin ERP Team · Golyan Group
Asim Upadhyay (team lead), Aardik Acharya,
Bipin Sapkota, Aayush Shah
→

Two parties,one season

One grows the crop. The other sells it. Everything a bank would want to know happens between these two.

Party one
Farmer
The producer
—Grows the crop and takes the weather risk
—Looks after the crop from planting to harvest
—Needs the right inputs at the right time
Party two
Venture
The market, the price, the reach
—Gets its crop supply without running the farms
—Finds the buyers and sets the price
—Every cost, yield and delivery lands in its books

Together, every season leaves a full record: what was spent, what was grown, what it sold for. Today, that record lives only in a notebook.

The problem:No record, No score, No loan

Everything worth knowing already happens on the farm: what was planted, what it cost, what was delivered. The venture sees all of it, and writes none of it down. An ERP would hold that record. A credit engine would turn it into a score. Neither exists today, so no record, no score, no loan.

The farmer cannot be scored

He grows well and delivers on time, season after season.

Nobody writes it down, so no bank has ever heard of him. He cannot borrow in his own name.

The venture cannot grow

It pays for every season out of its own pocket. When that cash runs out, it stops taking farmers.

A bank could fund the rest. But a bank wants proof, and there is none to show it.

The bank cannot lend

By rule 12% of its lending must go to agriculture, rising to 15% by 2028. The money is sitting there.

But it cannot tell a good farmer from a bad one. So it lends blind, or it does not lend at all.

7.92% of agricultural lending has gone bad, against 4.62% across the banking system as a whole. The reason is the same for the venture, the farmer and the bank: nobody has a reliable record of what has actually been spent on a crop.

What we willbe building

The ERP

It runs the farm: plots, contracts, inputs issued, field work, harvest, sale and traceability. It earns its keep on its own, before a rupee of credit is lent.

The AgriCredit Engine

It reads that record, scores the farmer on six checks out of 900, and sets a credit limit. The credit goes out as goods, not cash, and comes back from the buyer’s payment at harvest.

Project scope, the features we build
01Farmers and land who farms, and on which plot
02Contracts and planning what each farmer grows, and when
03Inputs and field work what goes on the crop, and what it cost
04Harvest and storage what came off the plot, weighed and graded
05Sales and payment who bought it, and who still owes
06Credit scoring and lending the engine itself
07Insurance and risk cover bound before sowing, claims from the field
08Bank integration the credit file the bank reads
09Platform and reporting farmer app in Nepali, offline, consent

How the creditengine works

1Reads

Lease, contract, inputs issued, field work, weighbridge ticket, grade sheet

2Values

What the crop has cost so far, plus what it still needs. That is the base.

3Scores

Six checks, 900 points. Every check shows its evidence.

4Releases

Goods from an approved supplier, never cash. Recovered from the buyer's payment.

The score: six checks, 900 points, rescored every season
Tenure180
Yield history225
Input spend135
Delivery180
Buyer order135
Group45
The ERP runs the farm

It records the season as it happens: plots, contracts, inputs, field work, harvest and sale.

The credit engine reads that record. No ERP, no score.

The score sets the band

Band A  630+  →  70%
Band B  540–629  →  60%
Band C  405–539  →  45%
Below 405  →  referred

Capped at 80% of the buyer order.

The officer confirms it

A field officer visits the plot and confirms the category, or moves it up or down one.

The score proposes. The officer decides.

Issued as a letter of credit

The venture sets a budget against the category and issues it as an LC, never cash.

The farmer draws inputs against it at an approved supplier.

Before the season starts, the venture and the farmer sign a contract: what will be grown, on which plot, and what the venture will pay for it.

Every plot insured,every claim checked in the field

Bad weather hits a whole district on the same day, and no score can protect against that. So every plot is insured before planting starts, and a field officer visits in person before any claim is paid.

Insured before planting

Every plot is insured before planting starts, the crop and the field both.

The policy, how much it covers, and how much government paid all sit on that plot’s record.

A field officer checks it

If a crop is damaged, a field officer goes to the plot, notes how far the crop had grown and how much was lost, and takes photographs.

Every step, from the claim to the payment, goes on the same record with his name on it.

A loss is not a failure

A farmer who loses 8 tonnes to a flood is not treated as a farmer who failed to deliver 8 tonnes.

An insured plot also gets five points more credit than an uninsured one, up to a limit of 75%. That is why farmers insure.

80% of the insurance cost is paid by government, on cover up to one crore. Insurance is already cheap. What is missing is a record good enough to claim on. The venture buys it, an insurance company pays the claims, our software keeps the record.

What wealready have

We do not need to buy anything in. Everything this build needs is already inside the Group.

A development team

Software engineers already on the Group’s payroll, with spare capacity.

Built at cost. No vendor, no licence fee, no foreign currency, and the software stays ours.

Product and go-to-market

A product manager to run the build, and the Group’s own marketing team to sell it.

Field operations and training for the pilot come from people already employed here.

A venture to build it on

The Group’s own agri venture gives us a real season to build against, free.

We prove the software there first. It is a test site, not a sale.

→

A competitor has to find a venture willing to try software nobody has run yet. We have one inside the Group, so we reach our first customer with a full season already proven.

Whobuys it

Three buyers, and each one already has the problem this software solves.

BuyerWhy they buyWhenThe Group’s own ventureWe prove the software on a real season here first. It costs them nothing and it costs us the pilot budget.Pilot, freeBig producers: sugar mills, dairies, poultry, tea, herbsThey already give hundreds of growers seed and feed on credit, and carry that risk on paper. This puts it on a record a bank will fund.Year 1Banks and microfinanceBy rule 12% of their lending must go to agriculture, rising to 15% by 2028, and they have far too few files they can actually assess.Year 2GovernmentIt pays 80% of the crop insurance premium, up to one crore insured, and the provinces deliver the programme. Neither can see, plot by plot, what the subsidy bought.Year 2–3

What it costs, and when it pays back

CapEx
What we spend once, to build it · NPR
Software development (4 people, 6 months)20,00,000Infrastructure and licences5,00,000Pilot operations and training3,00,000Contingency for overruns2,00,000Total build cost30,00,000
OpEx
What it costs us each year, once live · NPR
Support and maintenance10,00,000Hosting and infrastructure5,00,000Total running cost a year15,00,000

This starts only after the build is finished.

Revenue
Who subscribes, and when · NPR
One venture subscription25,00,000Year 1 · 2 to 3 ventures50–75,00,000Year 2 · banks: ADBL, RBB, microfinance+ subscriptionsYear 2–3 · government, for the data+ subscriptions

The same subscription sells to a bank and to government, which pay for the data rather than the farm tools. None has been approached yet.

Under 6 months

to build it, then pilot it free on the Group’s own venture to prove it on a real season. We sell only after that.

2 ventures

repay the whole build inside the first year of selling. Every subscription after that renews each year.

7 segments

buy the same software: sugar, dairy, poultry, tea, herbs, co-operatives and banks. One build, many ventures.

Why us, and what we are asking for

Our unfair advantage

We sit inside a group that already runs an agri venture, so we can prove the software on a real season before we sell it to anyone.

We build it rather than rent it, so the software stays ours to sell.

Against the competition

AgriERP, FarmERP, AGRIVI and Cropin are strong on the everyday features. We say so plainly.

None of them scores credit from the business’s own cost records. They score from satellite data the farmer cannot see. Ours is published, with the evidence beside it.

No rule change needed

We sell software. We never lend, never hold anyone’s money, and carry no credit risk.

NRB’s digital lending guideline lets a technology provider help a bank read a borrower’s record, with the lending risk staying where it already sits, with the bank.

The ask

NPR 30 lakh, four people for six months, and one named sponsor at business-head level. In return: a working ERP and credit engine, proven on a full season at the Group’s own venture before we sell it outside.

Three stages, each ending in a test that must pass before the next begins: define and build (months 1 to 6), a free pilot season on the Group’s own venture, then the first outside sale.

Questions and where to read further

Every figure on these slides is written up and sourced. The proposal and the full scope are behind the QR code.

Project Proposal
22 pages
Scope of the Project
9 pages
Live prototype
Demonstration data
QR code linking to the proposal and scope documents

Proposal and full scope

agricredit.shahaayush.com.np/docs

→